北京生物医学工程

基于德尔菲法的区域卫生信息管理平台指标体系构建

Construction of indicator system for regional health informationmanagement platform based on Delphi method

作者：王晓丽孙雪松张寅杨思睿徐婉丽

单位：上海市浦东卫生发展研究院(上海200129)

分类号：R318.04

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2017·36·4（390-393）

摘要：

目的构建适合区域卫生信息管理平台的指标体系，为卫生行政管理提供有效、经济和便捷的信息化服务。方法采用德尔菲法筛选指标。首先，以电子邮件的方式将问卷发给专家，由专家评分；其次，回收专家评分表进行数据统计分析，根据指标筛选规则来剔除不符合要求的指标；最后，经过2~3轮德尔菲法咨询后形成指标体系。结果经过两轮德尔菲咨询后，专家意见基本一致，两轮专家问卷回收率及有效率均为100%，专家权威系数0.721，专家的权威性较高。按照专家意见，在第一轮咨询后删除16个三级指标，第二轮专家咨询后删除15个三级指标，最后形成包含4个一级指标、13个二级指标、98个三级指标的指标体系。结论应用德尔菲法建立指标体系，具有一定的科学性和权威性，可以为后续平台开发提供依据，进而为卫生行政管理部门提供便捷的信息化服务。

Objective To construct the indicator system of regional health information platform in order to provide effective,economic and convenient information service for regional health management.Methods We screen indicators by using Delphi method.First,the questionnaires are sent to the experts by E-mail.Then,we collect the questionnaires after the experts have finished them,and delete the unsatisfactory indicators according to the rules of indicator selection.Finally,the indicator system is formed after the second or third round Delphi.Results The experts come to an agreement after the second-round Delphi method.Both of the recovery rate and effective rate of the questionnaires are 100%.The Cr is 0.721.Sixteen third level indicators are deleted after the first round Delphi and 15 third level indicators are deleted after the second round Delphi.Eventually,the indicator system contains 4 first grade indicators,13 second grade indicators and 98 third grade indicators.Conclusions The indicator system constructed by Delphi method is scientific and authoritative.As the basis for the development of subsequent information platform,this indicator system provides informationization service for medical administration.

参考文献：

［1］许培海.我国区域卫生信息平台建设现状及趋势研究［J］.中国数字医学，2016,11(5):23-26.

Xu Peihai.Status and trend of regional health information platform construction in China［J］.China Digital Medicine,2016,11(5):23-26.

［2］徐国祥.统计预测和决策［M］.上海：上海财经大学出版社,2005：11.

［3］刘伟涛,顾鸿,李春洪.基于德尔菲法的专家评估方法［J］.计算机工程,2011,37(S):189-191,204.

Liu Weitao,Gu Hong,Li Chunhong.Expert evaluation method based on Delphi method［J］.Computer Enginneering,2011,37(S):189-191,204.

［4］陈艳佳,任慧玲.基于德尔菲法的开放获取期刊评价指标筛选［J］.中华医学图书情报杂志,2016,25(5):11-15.

Chen Yanjia,Ren Huiling.Criteria for assessing open access journals selected according to Delphi method［J］.Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science,2016,25(5):11-15.

［5］程琮,刘一志,王如德.Kendall协调系数W检验及其SPSS实现［J］.泰山医学院学报,2010,31(7):487-490.

Cheng Cong,Liu Yizhi,Wang Rude.The test for Kendalls coefficient of concordance W conducted by SPSS［J］.Journal of Taishan Medical College,2010,31(7):487-490.

［6］王春枝,斯琴.德尔菲法中的数据统计处理方法及其应用研究［J］.内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版),2011,9(4):92-96.

Wang Chunzhi,Si Qin.A study of data statistical processing method of Delphi method and its application［J］.Journal Editorial Department of Inner Mongolia Unicersity of Finance and Economics,2011,9(4):92-96.

［7］杨思睿,王晓丽.基于德尔菲法的医院信息化建设投资相关因素研究［J］.中国数据医学,2015,10(4):84-86.

Yang Sirui,Wang Xiaoli.Study of the factors related to hospital information construction investment based on Delphi method［J］. China Digital Medicine,2015,10(4):84-86.

［8］张志强,顾啸天,熊季霞.公立医院综合绩效评价指标体系构建方法分析［J］.医学与社会,2015,28(10):5-8.

Zhang Zhiqiang,Gu Xiaotian,Xiong Jixia.Construction and analysis on the comprehensive performance evaluation index system of public hospital［J］.Medicine and Society,2015,28(10):5-8.

［9］文金宁，姚敏红.精神科专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建［J］.中国医药导报，2016,13(29):144-148.

Wen Jinning,Yao Minhong.Construction of core competence evaluation index system for psychiatry specialized nurses［J］.China Medical Herald，2016,13(29):144-148.

［10］朱莉，孙毅华，季波，等.基于德尔菲法的上海某专科医院公开招聘的影响因素研究［J］.中国医药导报，2015,12(27):63-66.

Zhu Li,Sun Yihua,Ji Bo,et al.Study of influence factor of open recruitment in a specialized hospital in Shanghai based on Delphi method［J］.China Medical Herald，2015,12(27):63-66.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】

提示：您还未登录，请登录！点此登录