设为首页 |  加入收藏
首页首页 期刊简介 消息通知 编委会 电子期刊 投稿须知 广告合作 联系我们
一种便携式多部位超声骨密度测量仪的研究

Research on a portable ultrasonic bone densitometer for multiple sites

作者: 许杨  陈焱焱  丁增辉  徐玉兵  马祖长  孙怡宁 
单位:<span style="font-family:宋体">中国科学院智能机械研究所(合肥</span> 230031<span style="font-family:宋体">)</span><p><span style="font-family:宋体">中国科学技术大学自动化系(合肥</span> 230026<span style="font-family:宋体">)</span></p>
关键词: 骨密度;  定量超声;  便携式;  桡骨;  胫骨;  骨质疏松 
分类号:R318.6
出版年·卷·期(页码):2018·37·2(193-196)
摘要:

Objective We developed a new ultrasound densitometer to estimate bone mineral density accurately at radius and tibia, and compared the values of ultrasound measurements obtained in a clinical study with gold standard measurement: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to determine the validity of the new device. Methods The probe was designed based on ultrasonic axial-transmission technology by using doubleemission and double-receiving mechanism. A temperature sensor was used to amend the results in the ultrasound measurements. Twenty five subjects aged 35. 5 years ± 11. 7 years were recruited for this study. The ultrasound parameters (SOSFAS-radius, SOSFAS-tibia) of each subject were measured in the distal 1/3 radius and middle tibia respectively, and bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (the vertebral levels L2-L4) was measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationships between the two ultrasound parameters and BMD. Results The correlation coefficients of SOSFAS-radiusand SOSFAS-tibiawith BMD were r = 0. 68 (P<0. 001) , and r= 0. 77 (P<0. 001) , respectively. Conclusions The parameters measured by the new device and BMD measured by DXEA were significantly correlated. Moreover, the device was designed at low cost and portable, which enable the popularization of osteoporosis diagnosis and monitoring, to provide an effective means for the screening of osteoporosis in large population-based.

参考文献:

[1]中国健康促进基金会.2013中国骨质疏松骨折防治蓝皮书[R].北京:中国健康促进基金会, 2013.China Health Promotion Foundation.China blue book osteoporosis fracture prevention 2103[R].Beijing:China Health Promotion Foundation, 2013.

[2]Baim S, Leslie WD.Assessment of fracture risk[J].Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2012, 10 (1) :28-41.

[3]邓红文, 刘耀中.骨质疏松学前沿[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2005:20-21.Deng HW, Liu YZ.Osteoporosis preschool[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2005:20-21.

[4]Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J, et al.The information imperative:is it time for an informed consent process explaining the risks of medical radiation?[J].Radiology, 2012, 262 (1) :15-18.

[5]Laugier P.Instrumentation for in vivo ultrasonic characterization of bone strength[J].IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectric and Frequency Control, 2008, 55 (6) :1179-1196.

[6]Laugier P, Haiat G.Bone quantitative ultrasound[M].New York:Springer, 2011.

[7]伍于添.医学超声设备[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 2014:133-134.Wu YT.Medical equipment of ultrasound[M].Beijing:Science and Technology Literature Press, 2014:133-134.

[8]Xu Y, Xu Y, Chen Y, et al.Quantitative ultrasound measurement of bone density based on dynamic time window:suitable for the measurement of speed of sound in radius[J].Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2016, 43:347-354.

[9]Xu KL, Ta D, He RX, et al.Axial transmission method for long bone fracture evaluation by ultrasonic guided waves:simulation, phantom and in vitro experiments[J].Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2014, 40 (4) :817-827.

[10]Kantorovich E, Pasternak V, Ashkenazi S, et al.Determination of acoustic velocity in bone:US, 7112173 B1[P].2006.

[11]Talmant M, Kolta S, Roux C, et al.In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment[J].Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2009, 35 (6) :912-919.

[12]Muller M, Moilanen P, Bossy E, et al.Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment[J].Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2005, 31 (5) :633-642.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
 
友情链接  
地址:北京安定门外安贞医院内北京生物医学工程编辑部
电话:010-64456508  传真:010-64456661
电子邮箱:llbl910219@126.com