设为首页 |  加入收藏
首页首页 期刊简介 消息通知 编委会 电子期刊 投稿须知 广告合作 联系我们
经导管瓣膜瓣中瓣模式下流体力学性能体外测试及评价

Hydrodynamic performance testing and evaluation of the transcatheter heart valve in valve-in-valve model

作者: 刘丽  万辰杰  柯林楠  王春仁  
单位:中国食品药品检定研究院(北京 102629) <p>通信作者:王春仁。E-mail:chunrenwang@263.net</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
关键词: 经导管瓣中瓣;经导管瓣膜;生物瓣膜;稳态前向流实验;稳态反向泄漏实验;脉动流实验  
分类号:R318.01
出版年·卷·期(页码):2021·40·4(393-399)
摘要:

目的 随着生物瓣膜毁损病例的增加,越来越多的经导管瓣膜作为瓣中瓣被应用于二次瓣膜置换手术,但其流体力学性能鲜有报道。本文将经导管瓣膜安装在生物瓣膜内形成瓣中瓣结构,并对其流体力学性能进行体外测试及评价。方法 将经导管瓣膜(23 mm、27 mm、29 mm)分别安装在对应规格生物瓣膜(23 mm、27 mm、29 mm)中形成瓣中瓣,进行稳态前向流实验、稳态反向泄漏实验、脉动流实验,对其流体力学性能进行评价,并与同规格生物瓣膜流体力学性能进行对比。结果 稳态前向流实验中,同一规格的经导管瓣中瓣跨瓣压差随着前向流量的增大而增大。稳态反向泄漏实验中,同一规格的经导管瓣中瓣泄露量随着反向压力的增大而增大。脉动流实验中,经导管瓣中瓣和生物瓣膜的平均跨瓣压差、返流百分比和有效瓣口面积变化趋势相同的。对于同一规格的经导管瓣中瓣和生物瓣膜,随着心输出量的增加,跨瓣压差增大,返流百分比减小,有效瓣口面积增大;在同一心输出量下,随着经导管瓣中瓣和生物瓣膜规格的增大,跨瓣压差减小,返流百分比增大,有效瓣口面积增大。结论 经导管瓣中瓣体外脉动流性能指标满足YY/T1449.3-2016标准中经导管瓣膜的性能要求,且其脉动流性能与同规格生物瓣膜相比无明显差异。该经导管瓣中瓣具有良好的血流动力学性能。

Objective With the increase of bioprosthetic valve damage cases, Valve in valve - transcatheter heart valves(ViV-THV) are used in secondary valve replacement. But there are few reports on its hydrodynamic performance . In this paper, the transcatheter heart valves is installed in the bioprostheticl valve to form a valve- in-valve model, and its hydrodynamic performance is tested and evaluated in vitro. Methods Transcatheter heart valves (23mm, 27mm and 29mm) were respectively installed in bioprosthetic valves(23mm, 27mm and 29mm) as ViV-THV. The steady forward-flow testing,the steady back-flow leakage testing and pulsatile-flow testing were carried out to evaluate the hydrodynamic properties of the ViV-THV, and the hydrodynamic properties were compared with bioprosthetic valves. Results In the steady forward-flow testing, the pressure gradients of  ViV-THV increased with the increase of the forward flow rate. In the steady back-flow leakage testing, the leakage volume of the ViV-THV increased with the increase of the reverse pressure. In the pulsatile-flow testing, the mean pressure gradients, the paravalvular leakage and the effective orifice area had the same trend with the bioprosthetic valves. With the increase of cardiac output, the mean pressure gradients increased, the paravalvular leakage decreased and the effective orifice increased for the same size of ViV-THV and bioprosthetic valve. Under the same cardiac output, the mean pressure gradients decreased, the paravalvular leakage increased and the effective orifice area increased with the increase of the size of the ViV-THV and bioprosthetic valve. Conclusions  Hydrodynamic performance of the ViV-THV were in line with the YY /T 1449.3-2016 standards, and there were no significant difference with the same size bioprosthetic valve. The transcatheter heart valve prostheses performed well in the described valve-in-valve settings.

参考文献:

[1]?? 于振坤,樊红光,郑哲, 等.老年瓣膜性心脏病患者生物瓣与机械瓣置换术后早期和中期预后的对比研究[J].中国循环杂志,2018,33(11):1098-1101.

Yu ZK, Fan HG, Zheng Z, et al. The short-term and mid-term outcomes of elderly patients with valvular heart disease undergoing valve replacement with biological or mechanical prostheses[J].Chinese Circulation Journal,2018,33(11):1098-1101.

[2]?? 赵伟,郑哲.50至70岁心脏瓣膜置换患者瓣膜选择与长期预后[J].中国心血管病研究,2020,18(4): 330-333.

Zhao W, Zheng Z. Valve selection and long-term prognosis in patients aged 50-70 with heart valve replacement[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research,2020,18(4): 330-333.

[3] 机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜置换术15年后结果对比:对退伍军人随机试验的最终报告[J].国外医学(心血管疾病分册),2001,28(4):254-255.

[4] 何盛南,曲龙,邹志成, 等.生物心脏瓣膜移植研究进展[J].器官移植,2017,8(5):410-412.

[5] Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease[J]. European Heart Journal,2017,38(36):2739-2791.

[6]? Ziccardi MR, Elliott?MG.?Bioprosthetic?valve?fracture?for?valve-in-valve?transcatheter?aortic?valve?replacement[J].?Interventional?Cardiology?Clinics,2019,8(4).373-382.

[7]Higa S, Nagano T, Yamashiro S, et al. Mitral valve perforation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement[J]. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, 2020,28(5): 276-278.

[8]Sang SLW,?Giri J, Vallabhajosyula P, et al.?Transfemoral?transcatheter?valve-in-valve-in-valve?replacement[J].?The?Journal?of?Thoracic?and?Cardiovascular?Surgery,2016,152(2): 622-623.

[9]Yoon?SH, Whisenant?BK, Bleiziffer?S, et al. Outcomes?of?transcatheter?mitral?valve?replacement?for?degenerated?bioprostheses,?failed?annuloplasty?rings,?and?mitral?annular?calcification[J].?European?Heart?Journal, 2019, 40(5): 441-451.

[10]Yamashita K, Fukushima S, Shimahara Y, et al. Early?outcomes?of?transcatheter?mitral?valve?replacement?for?degenerated?bioprosthesis?in?Japanese?(MITRAL?VIV?study):?a?four-case?series[J].?General?Thoracic?and?Cardiovascular?Surgery,2020,68: 1-8.

[11]朱鹏,Erlebach M, Ziegelmueller JA,等.完全经皮二尖瓣植入和主动脉瓣Valve-in-valve植入术一例[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(2):230-232.

[12] 朱鹏,Erlebach M, Ziegelmueller JA, 等.经食管三维超声心动图引导经皮二尖瓣植入术和主动脉瓣Valve-in-Valve植入术1例[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2020,29(2):180-181.

[13]Dale JM, Janarthanan S, Stephanie LS, et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients[J].Structural Heart,2019,3(4):324-328.

[14]Mohammed AB. Degenerated suturless perceval with (paravalvular leak and AS) treated by valve in valve using S3 Edward valve[J]. Heart Views, 2019, 20(4):166.

[15]Taylor MJ, Sotiris CS, Mark R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve in valve implantation with bioprosthetic valve fracture[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions,2019,93(6):1170-1172.

[16]Abbas AE. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the phobia of an elevated echocardiographic gradient[J]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2019,74(11): 1516-1517.

[17]Timothy AJ, Mackram FE, Allison KC, et al. Long‐term outcomes of melody valve‐in‐valve implantation for bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions,2019,93(6):1087-1094.

[18]Alexander PK, Michael B, Isaac G. Direct access valve‐in‐valve implantation for management of complex valvulopathy[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2019, 93(7): 1385-1388.

[19] 国家食品药品监督管理总局. YY/T 1449.3—2016/ISO 5840-3:2013 心血管植入物 ?人工心脏瓣膜 第3部分: 经导管植入式人工心脏瓣膜 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.

China Food and Drug Administration. YY/T 1449.3—2016/ISO 5840-3:2013 Cardiovascular implants— Cardiac valve prostheses — Part 3: Heart valve substitutes implanted by transcatheter techniques [S].Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2016.

[20] ISO/TC150/SC 2 Cardiovascular implants and extracorporeal systems. ISO 5840-3:2013 Cardiovascular implants— Cardiac valve prostheses — Part 3: Heart valve substitutes implanted by transcatheter techniques [S].Switzerland: ISO Copying Office: 2013.

[21] Nalluri N, Atti V, Munir AB, et al. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2018, 31(5): 661-671.

?

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
 
友情链接  
地址:北京安定门外安贞医院内北京生物医学工程编辑部
电话:010-64456508  传真:010-64456661
电子邮箱:llbl910219@126.com